0.07/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.07/0.12	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.12/0.33	% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
0.12/0.33	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.33	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.33	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPULimit   : 960
0.12/0.33	% WCLimit    : 120
0.12/0.33	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 05:25:42 EDT 2022
0.12/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.19/0.46	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.19/0.46	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.19/0.46	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.19/0.47	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLSNHSA.
0.19/0.47	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.19/0.47	# Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores
0.19/0.47	# Starting sh5l with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.47	# Starting new_bool_1 with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.47	# Starting new_bool_2 with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.47	# sh5l with pid 20989 completed with status 0
0.19/0.47	# Result found by sh5l
0.19/0.47	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLSNHSA.
0.19/0.47	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.19/0.47	# Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores
0.19/0.47	# Starting sh5l with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.47	# SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
0.19/0.47	# ...ProofStateSinE()=5/71
0.19/0.47	# Search class: HHHNF-FFSF00-SHSSMFNN
0.19/0.47	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.19/0.47	# Starting new_ho_10 with 73s (1) cores
0.19/0.47	# new_ho_10 with pid 20993 completed with status 0
0.19/0.47	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.19/0.47	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLSNHSA.
0.19/0.47	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.19/0.47	# Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores
0.19/0.47	# Starting sh5l with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.47	# SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
0.19/0.47	# ...ProofStateSinE()=5/71
0.19/0.47	# Search class: HHHNF-FFSF00-SHSSMFNN
0.19/0.47	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.19/0.47	# Starting new_ho_10 with 73s (1) cores
0.19/0.47	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.19/0.47	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.19/0.47	
0.19/0.47	# Proof found!
0.19/0.47	# SZS status Theorem
0.19/0.47	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_22, type, in: $i > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_23, type, is_a: $i > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_24, type, emptyset: $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_25, type, unord_pair: $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_26, type, singleton: $i > $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_27, type, union: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_28, type, excl_union: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_29, type, intersection: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_30, type, setminus: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_31, type, complement: ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_32, type, disjoint: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_33, type, subset: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_34, type, meets: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_35, type, misses: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_36, type, cartesian_product: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_37, type, pair_rel: $i > $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_38, type, id_rel: ($i > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_39, type, sub_rel: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_40, type, is_rel_on: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_41, type, restrict_rel_domain: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_42, type, rel_diagonal: $i > $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_43, type, rel_composition: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_44, type, reflexive: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_45, type, irreflexive: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_46, type, symmetric: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_47, type, transitive: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_48, type, equiv_rel: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_49, type, rel_codomain: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_50, type, rel_domain: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_51, type, rel_inverse: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_52, type, equiv_classes: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_53, type, restrict_rel_codomain: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_54, type, rel_field: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_55, type, well_founded: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_56, type, upwards_well_founded: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_57, type, epred1_0: $i > $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_58, type, epred2_0: $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_59, type, epred3_0: $i > $o).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_60, type, esk1_0: $i).
0.19/0.47	thf(decl_61, type, esk2_0: $i).
0.19/0.47	thf(is_rel_on, axiom, ((is_rel_on)=(^[X28:$i > $i > $o, X29:$i > $o, X30:$i > $o]:(![X1:$i, X3:$i]:(((X28 @ X1 @ X3)=>((X29 @ X1)&(X30 @ X3))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET008^2.ax', is_rel_on)).
0.19/0.47	thf(rel_domain, axiom, ((rel_domain)=(^[X28:$i > $i > $o, X1:$i]:(?[X3:$i]:((X28 @ X1 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET008^2.ax', rel_domain)).
0.19/0.47	thf(rel_codomain, axiom, ((rel_codomain)=(^[X28:$i > $i > $o, X3:$i]:(?[X1:$i]:((X28 @ X1 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET008^2.ax', rel_codomain)).
0.19/0.47	thf(thm, conjecture, ![X28:$i > $i > $o, X36:$i > $o, X37:$i > $o]:((![X24:$i]:(((?[X4:$i]:(((rel_domain @ X28 @ X4)&(X36 @ X4)))<=(rel_codomain @ X28 @ X24))<=(X37 @ X24)))<=(is_rel_on @ X28 @ X36 @ X37))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', thm)).
0.19/0.47	thf(c_0_4, plain, ((is_rel_on)=(^[Z0:$i > $i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i > $o]:(![X1:$i, X3:$i]:(((Z0 @ X1 @ X3)=>((Z1 @ X1)&(Z2 @ X3))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[is_rel_on])).
0.19/0.47	thf(c_0_5, plain, ((rel_domain)=(^[Z0:$i > $i > $o, Z1:$i]:(?[X3:$i]:((Z0 @ Z1 @ X3))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rel_domain])).
0.19/0.47	thf(c_0_6, plain, ((rel_codomain)=(^[Z0:$i > $i > $o, Z1:$i]:(?[X1:$i]:((Z0 @ X1 @ Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rel_codomain])).
0.19/0.47	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ~(![X28:$i > $i > $o, X36:$i > $o, X37:$i > $o]:((![X47:$i, X48:$i]:(((X28 @ X47 @ X48)=>((X36 @ X47)&(X37 @ X48))))=>![X24:$i]:(((X37 @ X24)=>(?[X46:$i]:((X28 @ X46 @ X24))=>?[X4:$i]:((?[X45:$i]:((X28 @ X4 @ X45))&(X36 @ X4))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm]), c_0_4]), c_0_5]), c_0_6])])).
0.19/0.47	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X52:$i, X53:$i, X56:$i, X57:$i]:(((((epred2_0 @ X52)|~(epred1_0 @ X52 @ X53))&((epred3_0 @ X53)|~(epred1_0 @ X52 @ X53)))&((epred3_0 @ esk1_0)&((epred1_0 @ esk2_0 @ esk1_0)&(~(epred1_0 @ X56 @ X57)|~(epred2_0 @ X56)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])])).
0.19/0.47	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i]:(((epred2_0 @ X1)|~((epred1_0 @ X1 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.19/0.47	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i, X1:$i]:((~((epred1_0 @ X1 @ X3))|~((epred2_0 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.19/0.47	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ esk2_0 @ esk1_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.19/0.47	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i]:(~((epred1_0 @ X1 @ X3))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])).
0.19/0.47	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12]), ['proof']).
0.19/0.47	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.19/0.47	# Parsed axioms                        : 71
0.19/0.47	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 66
0.19/0.47	# Initial clauses                      : 5
0.19/0.47	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.19/0.47	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
0.19/0.47	# Processed clauses                    : 4
0.19/0.47	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.19/0.47	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.19/0.47	# ...remaining for further processing  : 4
0.19/0.47	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.19/0.47	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.19/0.47	# Backward-subsumed                    : 1
0.19/0.47	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.19/0.47	# Generated clauses                    : 1
0.19/0.47	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
0.19/0.47	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.19/0.47	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
0.19/0.47	# Paramodulations                      : 0
0.19/0.47	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.19/0.47	# NegExts                              : 0
0.19/0.47	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.19/0.47	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.19/0.47	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.19/0.47	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.19/0.47	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.19/0.47	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.19/0.47	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.19/0.47	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.19/0.47	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.19/0.47	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.19/0.47	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.19/0.47	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.19/0.47	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.19/0.47	# Current number of processed clauses  : 2
0.19/0.47	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
0.19/0.47	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.19/0.47	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.19/0.47	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
0.19/0.47	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
0.19/0.47	# ...number of literals in the above   : 2
0.19/0.47	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.19/0.47	# Current number of archived clauses   : 2
0.19/0.47	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
0.19/0.47	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
0.19/0.47	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
0.19/0.47	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
0.19/0.47	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.19/0.47	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.19/0.47	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.19/0.47	# Condensation attempts                : 4
0.19/0.47	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.19/0.47	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 925
0.19/0.47	
0.19/0.47	# -------------------------------------------------
0.19/0.47	# User time                : 0.003 s
0.19/0.47	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.19/0.47	# Total time               : 0.005 s
0.19/0.47	# Maximum resident set size: 1916 pages
0.19/0.47	
0.19/0.47	# -------------------------------------------------
0.19/0.47	# User time                : 0.006 s
0.19/0.47	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.19/0.47	# Total time               : 0.010 s
0.19/0.47	# Maximum resident set size: 1812 pages
0.19/0.47	EOF